Complaint No. CC12501335


1

BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY
AUTHORITY, MUMBAI
Hearing in Hybrid mode as per MahaRERA
Circular No 49/2025

Complaint No. CC12501335


Mrs. PRERANA PARAB
...Complainant

Vs

RUPJI CONSTRUCTIONS
...Respondent


MahaRERA Project Registration No. P51900007380


O R D E R
on Amendment Application
(24.12.2025)
(Date of Hearing: 12.11.2025)

Coram: Shri. Ravindra Deshpande, Member-II, MahaRERA

Adv.Subham Bane for
Complainant
None appeared for Respondent

1. The complainant has filed the present application for amendment in the
complaint.

2. In short, the facts of the application are as follows:

3. It is submitted by the complainant that the present Application is filed to amend
the complaint, mainly for adding Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 as detailed in Schedule–
I annexed to the Application whose particulars were inadvertently not uploaded
while filing the complaint online.

4. It is stated that due to an inadvertent error only one Respondent’s name and
address came to be uploaded, though the complaint pertains to multiple parties
who are necessary and proper for adjudication of the dispute. The Complainant
has therefore sought permission to incorporate the details of the proposed
additional Respondents as mentioned in Schedule–I annexed to the
Application.


Complaint No. CC12501335


2

5. The Complainant submits that the proposed amendment is essential for proper
and complete adjudication of the matter and that no prejudice would be caused
to the existing Respondents if such amendment is permitted. On the contrary,
refusal to allow the amendment would cause grave injustice to the
Complainant.

6. It is submitted by the complainant that the above amendment does not
change the nature of the complaint and same is necessary on account of
subsequent development. If the same is not allowed, the complainant will
be put to grave irreparable loss. Hence, it is necessary to allow application.

7. Reasonable time was granted to the Respondent to file reply on the said
application. However, the Respondent has not filed any reply nor he
appeared before this Authority. Hence, this application has been decided in
the absence of a reply of the Respondent.

8. Considering the averments of the application and in order to decide the
case on merits, by giving appropriate opportunity to the parties and to
avoid multiplicity of the proceeding, in my opinion, the application
deserves to be allowed. Hence, I pass the following order:
O R D E R

1. Application is allowed.

2. The Complainant is permitted to amend the complaint as per Schedule-I
attached to this application within 15 days from the date of this order.

3. The complainant is directed to upload the amended complaint on
MahaRERA website immediately.


Date: 24.12.2025


(Ravindra Deshpande)


Member – II, MahaRERA
RAVINDRA
PADMAKARA
O DESHPANDE
Digitally signed by
RAVINDRA
PADMAKARAO
DESHPANDE
Date: 2025.12.24
17:41:18 +05'30'