top of page
Maha RERA Order Details
Order Details:
Order - CC12401178
Order Type:
Order
Order Date:
18 February 2026
Complaint No.:
Not available
RERA No.:
P51600000085
Project:
Project name not available
Complainant:
dhanaji eknath govardhane
Respondent:
SARVPPRATHAM DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
Heard by/Member:
Shri. Ravindra Deshpande, Member 2, MahaRERA
Subject:
Not available
Full extracted Order:
Complaint No. CC12401178
BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
MUMBAI
Hearing in Hybrid mode as per MahaRERA Circular No 49/2025
Complaint No. CC12401178
DHANAJI EKNATH GOVARDHANE
...COMPLAINANT
Vs
SARVPPRATHAM DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD ...RESPONDENT
MahaRERA Project Registration No. P51600000085
INTERIM O R D E R
(18/02/2026)
(Date of Hearing: 25/11/2025)
Coram: Shri. Ravindra Deshpande, Member 2, MahaRERA
Adv. Vishal Gaikwad is present for Complainant
Adv. Avinash Pawar is present for the Respondent
1. The Complainant has filed present application for amendment in the
complaint.
In short facts of the application are as follows:
2. According to the Complainant, he filed present complaint in the capacity of
Secretary of the Ad-hoc committee of the allottee. Thereafter allottees of the
project formed several Co-operative housing Societies under MCS Act, 1960. It
is further contended that it is necessary to add the said 11 Co-operative
housing Societies as a Complainants in the present complaint.
3. The Respondent has uploaded reply and opposed this application contending
that application is not maintainable, irrelevant, so deserves to be rejected in
limine. It is further submitted that the Maharera guidelines clearly provide
that separate complaints must be filed for distinct issues or by distinct
Complainants, unless a common cause of action and common relief are
involved and there is no such common cause of action or common relief exists.
Hence, Respondent requested for rejection of the application.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Page 1 of 2
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Complaint No. CC12401178
4. The Complainant also uploaded written submissions in support of the
application. I have gone through the same.
5. It is seen that the Complainant has filed present application to implead the 11
Co-operative housing Societies as a Complainants in the present complaint,
the names of which mentioned in the application, the Complainant is not
entitled to implead the said 11 Co-operative housing Societies as a
Complainants in the present complaint. It is necessary for the said societies to
file an application to implead them in the present complaint as a
Complainants. Hence, in my considered view, the such type of application
cannot be allowed and deserves to be rejected. Hence, I proceed to pass
following orders.
O R D E R
1. The application is rejected.
(Ravindra Deshpande)
Member-2, MahaRERA
Date: 18/02/2026
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Page 2 of 2
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
RAVINDRA
PADMAKARAO
DESHPANDE
Digitally signed by RAVINDRA
PADMAKARAO DESHPANDE
Date: 2026.02.18 17:22:25
+05'30'
MahaRERA order loaded successfully.
bottom of page
